Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10" Results 5241 - 5260 of 9,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 1:27 am by Nietzer
It does not mean that you will not hit road bumps along the way but if you have something like Stephen Martin’s suggestion for a 1 – 3 – 5 year program in writing and are following it, you can reject calls for major mid-course changes. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  The report, however, does not find that these unnamed persons had legal responsibility. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm by Samuel Bray
I'll leave the more detailed analysis of 1 and 2 to John Harrison, whose work on these questions is superb (see here and here and here). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
Ohio Revised Code § 2317.02(B)(1)(d) says that the physician-patient privilege “does not apply” in any criminal action against a physician or dentist. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
(I’ve blogged about some of these points before.) 1      A jurisprudence of “wrong the day it was decided. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  Hence, the argument goes, a finding of federal preemption does not alter the federal/state balance. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:22 pm
" Model Penal Code section 210.5(1). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:59 am
Both those cases concluded that the First Amendment true threats exception does require a showing of purpose to threaten. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 1:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   With those putative future de-SPAC transactions in mind, it is important to note what John Jenkins on The CorporateCounsel.net blog called “the biggest news in the proposal” – that is, the loss of the PSLRA safe harbor for projections in connection with de-SPAC transactions. [read post]