Search for: "Kat"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 6,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
In fact, trademarks are often also expressive, containing hints to the relevant product’s origin or characteristics.... and Kat Daniel'sIn this case, the Court pointed to the fact that VIP had itself represented that it both owned and used the “Bad Spaniels’ trademark and trade dress” to “identify and distinguish” VIP’s products and indicate their source. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:36 pm
This Kat thinks the tool will be useful, not only to individual creators but also to those interested in the management of intellectual assets, including complex IP rights portfolios handled in-house and by law firms. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:45 am
The AmeriKat's professional life, be it on the Kat or sat at her desk litigating her hours away, involves a huge amount of coordination, support and opposition with lawyers from all over the world. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 2:39 am
Kat friends Lau Kok Keng and Nicholas Lauw, partners, and Jiamin Leow, associate, of Rajah & Tann, share their thoughts on a recent trademark decision in Singapore regarding the thorny matter of when parallel importation may not be allowed. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:21 am
BIODERMA: products for almost all sortsof skin -- but not furry skin ...Earlier this week, an interesting cross-litigation saga involving the French BIODERMA marks bounced around the social networks: a trade mark battle which ended with the Court of Appeal of Rouen’s judgment, released in September last year, for which I send my warmest katpat to our former guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:29 am
This moggy and the other Kat-bloggers are quite busy enough with their day-jobs and with covering other IP developments and have no interest in either manufacturing comments or manipulating debate. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:16 am
This Kat suspects that, despite the BestWater order, the CJEU will say that it is not OK to link to content first communicated without the authorisation of the relevant rights holder]. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
In fact, a grower that has planted a plant variety during the “provisional period” - without the authorization of the rightsholder – would be legally entitled to freely exploit the harvested material, even after the PVRs are granted, theoretically “forever”, namely until the plant variety dies; provided – of course - that the grower pays the rightsholder the “reasonable compensation” provided by Article 95.This conclusion has been strongly criticized… [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:58 am
The fact that no example of how the mark could be put to use in a way that would undermine Apple’s business was said to further illustrate this point.CommentBad faith was always that difficult area of trade mark law (prior to the SkyKick judgment) - however, this judgment does help shape another facet of it, and one that hasn’t been considered before (as far as this Kat is aware). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
Dorothea ThompsonIt is a truth universally acknowledged that kats enjoy a good laugh, coffee and birds. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:03 am
In particular, the changes to the minutes seem to be in order to support (albeit weakly in this Kat's view) an argument that the rights of the patentee to be heard on the issue of the referral were violated, and that the patentee had raised this issue with the Board of Appeal. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
The 44th weekly listing of the previous week's Katposts coincides with a public holiday in the IPKat's native England but, on the IP blogosphere, the Kats are working tirelessly once again to make sure that their readers are kept fully informed. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:40 am
This is indeed what has happened in practice, the Dutch case being a notable example.To this Kat the current question, however, is whether this is what the InfoSoc Directive actually allows (or allowed) Member States to do, also considering that Recital 32 requires Member States to arrive at a coherent application of Article 5 exceptions and limitations. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
One of the joys of blogging is that commenters, as well as alerting the hapless blogger to typographical errors and terminological infelicities, can alert to interesting aspects of a decision that did not seem striking at a first review.So it was with the case of the appeal decision Hospira v Genentech [2016] EWCA Civ 780, which, when this Kat first reviewed it, seemed to be a fairly straightforward case of the first instance judgment being affirmed on appeal – no, the judge did not… [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:47 am
This Guest Kat has been asked on a few occasions by non-IP specialists - do I really have to register my exclusive patent licence with the UK IPO? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
This is not the first time the Kat has raised the subject. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 am
It was therefore a welcome pleasure to this Kat that Walter has chosen to enlarge on his comments via a separate, stand-alone guest post which he has written together with his colleague Reinier Wijnstra. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:09 am
As boundaries are removed, the ability to combine agents and resources increase extralinearly [at least, that's the word this Kat thought he heard]. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:06 am
This Kat is now waiting for the full judgment to write a more detailed analysis: stay tuned! [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Earlier today this Kat posted this note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), the latest in a line of important trade mark rulings from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
