Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 6,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
A 2013 challenge to this law in Schuette v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:15 am
” ImmigrationProf Blog discusses Lynch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am
” More Supreme Court previews focus on particular areas of the law. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
Rees, No. 07-5439, 2007 WL 2075334 (25 Sept. 2007) (challenging the constitutionality of lethal injection), the district court explained that grant "has no impact on established law". [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
In a separate ongoing proceeding, Hernandez Lara v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:03 pm
Jammie Thomas Conservative Think Tank: RIAA v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
See Davis. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Davis, 18-6943 Issues: (1) Whether Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:28 pm
” Similarly in Rosenberger v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
United States, 17-1059, which presents what may be the most specific criminal-law question in the history of the world. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am
""However, a law firm's "failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided" (Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [Sup Ct New York County 2009], citing Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [1st Dept 2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2008]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C.… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
Davis L. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
A panel of the Federal Circuit, by a 2-1 vote, read the law narrowly to condition eligibility for CBM review on whether a patent claim itself contains “a financial activity element,” limiting its application. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
What rules and laws apply for a case that has been removed? [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:14 am
Hearst v Ganzi (2006) 145 CA4th 1195. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
But Parliament has changed electoral law surrounding prisoners regularly (see my research on this point here). [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
In Lafler v. [read post]
