Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 5241 - 5260 of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
After the passage of the Fair Share Act, each defendant, unless they were found to be 60% or more liable, would only have to pay their percentage share of the verdict. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
An unjust enrichment claim did survive, even though defendants argued that Costco couldn’t be held liable because there was no allegation that it actually participated in misleading activities. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:11 pm by Michael
In strict liability cases, the defendants are held liable if a certain act occurs, regardless of whether their actions meet the elements of negligence. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:40 am by David DePaolo
The indictments allege the kickbacks were concealed by the purchasing of accounts receivables from physicians.It should be noted that, other than Drobot's guilty plea in the criminal case against him, none of the defendants have admitted any wrongdoing and in fact have said publicly that they are innocent. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am by Alexandra Allan
The Defendants trustee applied for the caution obtained by Cargo Interests, and the payment out of the sale proceeds, to be struck out or withdrawn. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am by Alexandra Allan
The Defendants trustee applied for the caution obtained by Cargo Interests, and the payment out of the sale proceeds, to be struck out or withdrawn. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
Angie’s List’s disclosures didn’t meet that standard because they “cannot be construed as having been made for purposes of influencing consumers to buy Defendants goods or services. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 9:02 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The jury found the valve maker liable for failing to warn plaintiff of the known dangers of asbestos in the asbestos insulation on the heat valves and awarded the defendant $32 million. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:56 am by Lucie Gulino
The tort law legal claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), while applicable to any person, requires a plaintiff to prove (1) that the defendant either intended to cause the emotional distress or knew or should have known that their conduct would likely cause emotional distress, (2) that the defendants actions were so outrages they are “beyond all possible bounds of decency,” and (3) that the resulting distress was severe. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  A"'Mary Carter" agreement can give the "settling" defendant a financial interest in the remainder of the plaintiff’s case and more importantly in the amount recovered against any non-settling defendant(s). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
 The Defendant driver apparently fell asleep at the wheel and lost control. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 11:07 pm by John C. Manoog III
Under Chapter 93A, expenses include all losses which were the foreseeable consequences of the defendants unfair or deceptive settlement practices. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
Dixon Subscription Required WESTCHESTER COUNTYTorts Company Not Liable for Infant's Injuries; No Claim For Negligent Supervision Against Parents Adorno v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:03 pm
If United had no obligation to notify DHL of a potential antitrust claim because there was no such claim, then United would prevail on the merits and would not be liable just as it would not be liable if DHL’s antitrust claim had been discharged. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
As to those fact situations where the defendants conduct was within the parameters of the sport, the defendant owed no legal duty, so the plaintiff’s claim would be barred as a matter of law. [read post]