Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 21,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
Bush, to defend the structure of the CFPB against a constitutional challenge in Seila Law v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 2:34 pm
(…) This principle is also articulated by Justice Scalia in his Aereo dissent: “The defendant may be held directly liable only if the defendant itself ‘trespassed on the exclusive domain of the copyright owner. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 10:11 am
Somewhat in contrast to the patient’s testimony, the plaintiff’s complaint asserted that the patient had been “physically taken down, restrained, and controlled… in a negligent manner,” thereby causing his injuries; according to the plaintiff, the defendant was liable for the actions of its employees under a theory of respondeat superior. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:32 am
In such cases, the defendant is liable for harm even though he or she did not intend to cause the harm and did not cause it by being reckless or negligent. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:28 am
The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The patient sued the acupuncturist, the named tenant, the building’s owners, and other defendants for damages related to her injuries from the fall. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:41 am
The order also prohibits misrepresentations about any other benefits of any post-secondary school or any other of the defendants’ products or services. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 7:41 am
The order also prohibits misrepresentations about any other benefits of any post-secondary school or any other of the defendants’ products or services. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:35 pm
It also concluded that because the jury did not find the defendant liable on the dram shop cause of action, the plaintiff did not suffer any error when the lower court dismissed its negligent supervision cause of action. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 pm
The court granted the defendant’s motion, and the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 2:47 pm
Acquisition’s suit against EMSI ultimately settled for a cash payment by the defendant officials and an assignment of their rights under EMSI’s D&O insurance policy. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:11 pm
Anyone joining knowingly in the commission of the above could be liable as well, probably under the conspiracy statute (18 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:24 am
Exclusive Control The defendant must have exclusive control of a property to be held liable. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
Third, the SEC’s complaint alleges the Defendants violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
As such, the court stated that, absent notice of frequent prior incidents on the premises, there was no duty on the landowner to post a guard at every restroom in the sports stadium.The court additionally rejected any arguments by the Plaintiff that the scope of the Defendant’s undertaking of providing security measures should have been broader than it was. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 2:17 pm
The court considered whether the defendant could be held liable, particularly in light of the violations. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
This listing occurs without regard to the likelihood that certiorari will be granted.Issues: (1) Whether a jury verdict finding a defendant liable under Section 2 of the Sherman Act for refusing to deal or cooperate with a competitor may be upheld when the jury was not instructed (a) that a monopolist has no general duty to deal with its business rivals or (b) that the plaintiff must prove that the refusal was contrary to the defendant’s short-run interests;… [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:29 pm
If the victim’s damages were proximately caused by the defendant’s breach of duty, the defendant can be held liable for payment of monetary compensation to the plaintiff for his or her damages. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm
Defendant Was Not Aware of the Dangerous Condition Defendants can be held liable for dangerous slip and fall conditions if you can show that they knew or should have known about such conditions. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:34 pm
For one, Colorado waived sovereign immunity, which seems like a bizarre strategic decision if Colorado wanted to defend the claim.Colorado also did not argue that the state fell outside the scope of Section 1983 claims, which allows a “person” to be held liable for damages. [read post]
