Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 5241 - 5260 of 36,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2021, 6:07 am by Wachler & Associates, P.C.
Other offices and departments may be involved in the rulemaking process if they are relevant to the subject matter of the proposed rule. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The parties, said the court, conceded that the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferred as a matter of school district policy. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The parties, said the court, conceded that the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferred as a matter of school district policy. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  CEQA elsewhere requires that an agency must provide for an appeal of a nonelected official’s or decisionmaking body’s exemption determination to the agency’s elected decisionmaking body (§ 21151(c)) and that the “local lead agency may establish procedures governing such appeals” (CEQA Guidelines, § 15061(e)). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 8:02 pm by JP Sarmiento
The criteria for favorable exercise of discretion was explained in Matter of C-V-T-, 22 I&N Dec. 7 (BIA 1998). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
But that court does not undertake the fact finding and determination of the matter. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:06 pm by Environmental Law Prof
For that matter, all the ship’s amenities are inequitably distributed, from food to medical care to cabin space.... [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Will Baude
" Of course, should such waiting periods be abused by pro-lifers (by either side for that matter) and become simple windows for overreaching propaganda, they will in fact not conduce to choice and thus would be properly invalidated. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The patent in suit had been opposed pursuant to Article 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty (Article 54 EPC) and lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC), Article 100(b) EPC for insufficiency of disclosure (Article 83 EPC), and Article 100(c) EPC for added matter (Article 123(2) EPC and Article 76(1) EPC).III. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:31 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
Nexo co-founder Antoni Trenchev said in a statement that the company doesn’t offer its lending or exchange products in New York “so it makes little sense to be receiving a C&D for something we are not offering in NY anyway. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm by Phil Dixon
The convictions were therefore vacated, and the matter remanded for a new trial. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Emily Dai
Célia Belin, Brookings visiting fellow, will offer opening remarks and moderate the discussion. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 5:08 am by Chijioke Okorie
To this end, and since the executive Bill has also passed the second reading, the Senate organised a joint public hearing on both Bills on 12 October 2021 through its committees on Trade and Investment, and Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Abella, Karakatsanis, and Kasirer JJ. concurring, Moldaver J. in separate concurring reasons with Brown and Rowe JJ. concurring, and Côté J. dissenting] … Robeside AssistanceRecently Published Ottawa Decisions Find below recently published Ottawa decisions, available for free through CanLII.org. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]