Search for: "People v Word" Results 5241 - 5260 of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
We have all met people who are quite intelligent, understand their circumstances, but whose judgment may be severely impaired.Perhaps the greatest feature of common law is its adaptability on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
PatentsKat Neil reflects on the lexical transformation of the “troll” from stock character in Scandinavian mythology (and plastic dolls with bright colored up-combed hair...) into a staple of contemporary IP discourse, not once but twice: The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling"Kat Troll DollIPKat provided further depth commentary on Warner-Lambert v Actavis, delving into the… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Shima Baradaran
With that in mind, please know that kind and understanding words in cover letters, emails, and the blogosphere go a long way. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343, 359 (2003), and intimidation "in the constitutionally proscribable sense of the word is a type of a true threat. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
’`So it is those facts, plus my legal determination that the words “without cohabitation” under that statute, under the case of Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:21 am by Jani Ihalainen
The public cannot be a restricted, small subset of people, but 'persons in general'. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:05 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbI have written quite a few posts about Dobbs v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:49 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Virginia, which struck down bans on interracial marriage 13 years later, and between Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
This, in Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) was said to be that of “a work of action, with or without words or music, which is capable of being performed before an audience. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Lee E. Berlik
Williams, 264 Va. 336, 341-42 (2002) (holding that defendant’s words must be considered in context rather than in isolation); Yeagle v. [read post]