Search for: "People v. To"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 73,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
People v Hunter, 2011 NY Slip Op 4542, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
We agree with defendant that the court's statements do not amount to a description of the range of the potential sentences but, rather, they constitute impermissible coercion, "rendering the plea involuntary and requiring its vacatur" (People v Fanini, 222 AD2d 1111; see People v Stevens, 298 AD2d 267, 268, lv dismissed 99 NY2d 585; People v Wilson, 245 AD2d 161, 163, lv denied 91 NY2d 946). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:16 pm
In People v LaFontaine (92 NY2d 470 [1998]) the Court of Appeals held that the Appellate Divisions cannot affirm a lower court's decision for reasons which were rejected by that lower court. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:54 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 6:42 am
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
Reasonable people should know that whenever you get a prescription filled, any law enforcement officer -- or any administrative officer with the state -- is entitled to know upon request what drugs you take. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 pm
Various people indicated that the most likely person to have done this was Mr. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:55 am
We just can't have people of your type in our country. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
Despite the fact that he made tons of people lose money, continues to deny responsibility, and transferred assets to his ex-wife to attempt to avoid his restitution obligations.Be glad it was Judge Hatter instead of me. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:34 pm
One of the upsides of having very smart people on a court is that they can not only resolve particular cases, but also examine more broadly whether existing doctrine seems right and, if it's not, what went wrong (and when).It seems pretty clear that Judge Berzon's going to call for en banc review. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
However, the primary reason why people refrain from such action is concern relating to the cost. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:43 pm
There's some useful stuff in this opinion about alter ego liability and adding nonparties as judgment debtors, so on the doctrinal front, it's worthy of a read.As for extra-legal lessons learned, I might suggest that one of them might be that if you're planning on getting together with a partner to make usurious loans to poor people over the Internet, it should perhaps not come as a surprise to you when your partner eventually tries 9allegedly) to steal from you; e.g., by… [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am
Velozny v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:44 pm
In A.M. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:40 am
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
Associated Newspapers Ltd, R (on the application of) v Rt Hon Lord Justice Leveson [2012] EWHC 57 – Read judgment On Friday 20 January 2012 the Administrative Court dismissed the second application for judicial review of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
In Nemmers v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
