Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 123,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm
A communication is confidential if it is made privately by any person to his or her spouse and is not intended for disclosure to any other person. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
However, a communication to any person involved in the treatment or examination of alcohol or drug abuse by a person being treated voluntarily or being... [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 8:32 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 411 provides that Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Evidence of a crime, wrong, or other act is not admissible to prove a person’s character in order to show that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with... [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:20 am
Texas Rule of Evidence 505(b) provides that A person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent another from disclosing a confidential communication by the person to a member of the clergy in the member's professional character as... [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 10:43 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 406 provides that Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice may be admitted to prove that on a particular occasion the person or organization acted in accordance with the habit or routine practice.... [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:29 am
Salud Natural Entrepreneur, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 12:40 am
Se ocupa de la vía de regreso y se pregunta si estamos ante una entelequia (pág. 202). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
I do not regard it as indispensable that the person making the repayment should be the same person as received the original payment, or that only two parties should be involved, although both may often be the case. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:53 am
On December 6, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a dramatic and historic ruling in the high-profile insider trading case of United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:54 am
Apple v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:41 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 1900; [2008] WLR (D) 294 “A person called to the Bar who had not found a place in chambers but fell within para 206.1 of the Code of Conduct was not thereby ‘authorised’ by the Bar Council to practise as a member of the profession whose members the Bar Council regulated for purposes of s 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999; accordingly he was apt to be prosecuted for providing immigration advice or immigration services… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:53 pm
Oregon employers should be aware of the Oregon Supreme Court’s recent decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:53 pm
Oregon employers should be aware of the Oregon Supreme Court’s recent decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:51 pm
From the industrious and observant Birgit Clark comes news of an interesting decision from Germany in the field of personality/privacy rights v freedom of art. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 9:33 am
DA 18-0629 2019 MT 150 Civil – Personal Injury/Death Harrisons v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:50 pm
Salim v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:11 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:21 pm
What makes a person an employee and not an independent contractor? [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:11 am
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court decided two important personal jurisdiction cases, J.McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
