Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 5,390
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
For our purposes, we consider whether the answer to the question depends on the character of the institution producing “law,” and the actors vested with the law making power. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Going further, the Court announced its intention to appoint its own damages experts to testify at trial, stating: Judge Alsup relied on the authority of Monolithic Power Sys. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
A weak Democratic President who tried to discipline this powerful Democratic constituency would risk alienating much-needed support; a Republican President would have to face the full force of their slings and arrows. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
By: David A. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in part, calling the decision “an unprecedented departure from our deferential review of discretionary agency decisions. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Thomas Morgan (D-Penn.), chair of the House Committee on International Relations, requested a Section 502B(c) report on countries including Argentina. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Thomas E. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:01 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am
A 1978 Supreme Court case, Monell v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Source: Susan Hilberg, History of Lattingtown Harbor, April 8, 2015.The cycles (or rhymes) of history Although the extravagant real estate of Cravath and Guthrie is a powerful hook for a legal audience, I’m not writing this post as a celebration of the wealth of Gilded Age lawyers. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
If nominated and confirmed, Kruger – who is just 45 years old – would be not only the first Black woman on the court, but also the youngest justice by over four years and the youngest justice confirmed since Clarence Thomas joined the court in 1991 at age 43. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Thomas of Maryland, “safe to be trusted with the destinies of a great nation and of an injured and magnanimous people. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu) Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu) Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto (jacq.briggs@utoronto.ca)John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jowertheimer@davidson.eduLaw and Empire in the Sino-Asian Context (Harvard Law School / TBD)12:00 PM – 4:30 PMLegal History and the Persistent Power of State and Local Governments (Cambridge Room)Moderators: Brooke… [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
A decade ago, Russia’s president, Vladimir V. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Thomas Massie (R-KY), argued that Congress did not delegate to the State Department the power to “regulate domestic public speech,” and further that the State Department’s reading of the law would chill innovation. [read post]
