Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY" Results 5241 - 5260 of 7,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
“ Justice Anthony Kennedy Festo Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am by Marcia Coyle
The case was closely watched by states, civil rights groups and others because it was filed shortly after the Supreme Court raised doubts about Section 5’s constitutionality in its 2009 ruling in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 3:19 am
This part of Kennedy is likely to find abhorrent the notion that, out of inertia, 37 states use a badly outmoded and potentially [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am by Aaron Tang
I really do hope that the Court doesn’t edge back towards Ohio v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 6:44 am by INFORRM
Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland ([2019] EWCA Civ 648 [£])(judgment not presently available on Bailii)(heard 25 to 26 July 2018): The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from a decision of Sir David Eady ([2018] EWHC 3368 (QB)). [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
9 May 2025, 11:14 am by Scott Bomboy
Souter also clearly delineated the boundaries between church and state in Hurley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm by JB
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]