Search for: "See v. See" Results 5241 - 5260 of 122,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
To avoid this problem, Federal District Court Judge, Brantley Starr, requires the following certification for pleadings filed in cases pending in his court [see this post for the text, which I omit here -EV] …. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Nevertheless, even these pared back disclosures may serve to drive companies to spend resources on compliance with our rules and conformity with other companies’ disclosed practices, instead of on combatting cyber threats as they see fit.[12] Once the SEC can peer into how all public companies handle cybersecurity, the temptation to micromanage their operations will only grow.[13] Third, the Commission’s expansive view of its authority is reflected in its overly narrow law… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]