Search for: "State v. Battle" Results 5241 - 5260 of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The arrests and charges followed a lengthy legal and political battle over Mauna Kea's future. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:05 am
Ohio State: The Battle Continues, Collegehoopsnet.com, Dec. 20, 2007, [www.collegehoopsnet.com] (last visited Feb. 24, 2008). 17 O'Brien v Ohio State Univ., No. 06AP-946, 2007 WL 2729077, at *14 (Ohio Ct. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
When the United States Supreme Court issued Brown v Board of Education, southern states engaged in Massive Resistance against it. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm by Douglas Berman
In his petition for review to the Supreme Court, Molina-Martinez noted that in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
“Respond” means what it says: does the company have a cyber-incident response plan that is battle-tested and ready to implement at a moment’s notice? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Revokey McRevokeface for McDonalds McMark Supermac's v McDonald's Cancellation no. 14787C, EUIPO (July 2019) I covered an earlier chapter of this burger battle in Volume V, in which poor evidence led to the loss of a BIG MAC EU trade mark registration. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
Vice President of Bing, Harry Shum, stated that"We do not copy Google's search results. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:50 am by SHG
As there is no federal bill or law specifically prohibiting the practice, the biggest battles against revenge porn take place in state legislatures. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by Lyle Denniston
Significantly, the Department, in the new document filed Tuesday night, relied upon several laws Congress passed to try to block Guantanamo prisoners entirely from the federal courts –  laws that remain on the books even after the Supreme Court, in the decision in Boumediene v. [read post]