Search for: "State v. Cash "
Results 5241 - 5260
of 5,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2011, 4:54 pm
In Stearns v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
In Stearns v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:08 am
It is a heavy burden for a lawyer from that oft-criticized office to mount any defense of its prosecutions, but Andrieu repeatedly found ways to botch virtually every point as she argued Smith v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
V. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 8:21 am
New York courts would have jurisdiction because you are located in New York State or New York City. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 11:41 am
Some of the ways they have done so: * In the GrooveShark case, the court held that pre-1972 sound recordings–which are governed by state copyright law, not federal copyright law–are not covered by the notice-and-takedown scheme. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm
No one can blame publishers for trying to cash in, but “Privacy and Libel Law: The Clash with Press Freedom” does not really do what it says on the tin. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:22 pm
By Asha Echeverria Greetings from the Vacationland State of Maine! [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:05 am
In so holding, the Court reaffirmed its holding in Corwin v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm
The en banc high court partially reversed a Court of Chancery decision that the derivative suit must be dismissed because IAC met the requirements of independence set by the milestone opinion in Kahn v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
We observe this today with the enormous cash balances that large firms have accumulated and the drooping demand for houses. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm
The Supreme Court recently relisted a petition for certiorari in Van Buren v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm
Clement Attlee, Nov. 1945 (Archives Canada via Wikimedia Commons) Its detractors might see the bill as a reprise of Wickard v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:04 am
And from law created in 1924 in Carroll v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in Brownback v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
“Fraud whistleblowers could get cash rewards. [read post]
