Search for: "State v. David." Results 5241 - 5260 of 14,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm by Richard Hasen
Three dissenting Justices (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and David Souter) argued that the law burdened many voters, and it was not justified by any state interest, given that the state failed to prove the law was necessary to prevent voter fraud or promote public confidence in the election process. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:32 am by MBettman
Ellen Kaforey et al., (argued April 19, 2016) David Antoon et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:45 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Need for a hearing A jury in the Circuit Court for Kent County convicted David Starkey of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder, and we affirmed his conviction in an unreported opinion filed in February 2000. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Every so often, I run across a particularly striking court opinion, which I think some of our readers might enjoy; here’s one, from a New York intermediate appellate court in 1874, Richards v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Authored by David Kramer, Brian Witten and Jason Mollick of Wilson Sonsini. [read post]
  The extent to which the law is clarified William Wilson and David Ormerod QC wrote that “[a] striking illustration of the unsatisfactory state of the law is that we cannot confidently describe the precise scope of joint enterprise liability. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm by Joe Koncelik
If it does impact a navigable water in that manner, then it falls under federal jurisdiction A key issue at the trial of Joseph David Anderson was whether the ponds Mr. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
While on unemployment I took tests for NYS and was offered a position by the State Fund. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am by Mark Rienzi
Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter recounted this history in their dissenting opinion in Zelman v. [read post]