Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
Loan Services LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
Yoo and LaCroix commented on how that executive order squares with a Supreme Court decision that shaped modern understanding of presidential power— Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California wasn’t buying it (JAE Properties, Inc. v AMTAX Holdings 2001-XX, LLC, 3:19-CV-02075 [SD Cal Feb. 9, 2024]). [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
United States; Zephier v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Chicago, the first employment law case of this term, and Holder v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
In the event that a person convicted under this section is the holder of any out-of-State driver's license, the court shall not collect the license but shall notify forthwith the chief administrator, who shall, in turn, notify appropriate officials in the licensing jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
In dicta, the court went one step further by stating that because“arrest is the first step to judicial sale of the vessel, which would wash the vessel [clean] of all maritime liens, it appears sensible to permit a lien holder to enforce a lien that has attached but not fully ripened once other parties have placed the vessel under arrest. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:04 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:00 am
On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a mandamus petition by Samsung and LG against a patent holder named Ikorongo, which belongs to Concert Technology Corporation. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
According to Steinthal, BMI’s ability to fractionally license could have severe consequences for licensees because they now cannot be certain that their public performance license was approved by all rights holders. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:33 pm
The court states that 'the record reflects that negotiations have been ongoing,' [...] but, as the district court even acknowledged, Motorola asserts otherwise--that Apple for years refused to negotiate while nevertheless infringing the '898 patent [...] [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am
It can be inferred from the decision that the CJEU agrees, stating as it does that application will require an "exceptional case" [par. 75]. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:27 pm
The royalty base.Even Judge Robart held in the Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 1:16 am
The case of Acacia Srl v Pneusgarda Srl and Audi AG concerned the sale of alloy rims for cars, for which Audi owns several registered community designs (e.g. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
As such, "[t]here may be an infringement of the exclusive distribution right, under Article 4(1) of [the InfoSoc Directive], where a trader, who does not hold the copyright, sells protected works or copies thereof and addresses an advertisement, through its website, by direct mail or in the press, to consumers located in the territory of the Member State in which those works are protected in order to invite them to purchase it. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
It is legally obliged to take down infringing content upon notification from the rights holder. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The trade mark holder hopes that consumers will use the products identified by the mark, including the hashtag slogan; he can build upon the hashtag slogan to redirect users to the company’s website and social networks, where their brand allegiance can be reinforced. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:22 am
InterDigital points to what happened in the Apple v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
