Search for: "State v. Little" Results 5241 - 5260 of 23,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 6:33 am by By Amy Kates
As a law school student at Yale, Jeremy Goldman was enraptured by David Boies' commanding, if losing, performance in Bush v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:00 am by Brad Walz
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its heavily anticipated opinion in the B&B Hardware v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:18 am by Roger Alford
by Roger Alford That’s the question, sort of, raised in Totes-Isotoner v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:13 am
 Chesapeake's royalty payments in North Texas have reportedly been on a net price of as little as eleven cents per mcf, and as little as 11% of the price other producers have based their royalty payments on. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Fargo disclosed the use of a low frequency (LF) RFID tag, but stated this was only an example and noted that a more powerful (high frequency (HF)) tag could be used. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
United States 1984) and barns (United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by David Kopel
”Over the subsequent decades, researchers tried, with little success, to replicate experiments proving a weapons effect. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Would the Ninth Circuit's ruling really be the same as it is here if we were talking about Little Rock in 1957? [read post]