Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 5241 - 5260 of 14,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 10:03 am
The seminal New Mexico case addressing worker's compensation exclusivity is the 2001 New Mexico Supreme Court case of Delgado v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:17 am
Save harmless clause bars employees and retirees from recouping Tax Deferred Plan investment losses from the School District Meirowitz v Bayport-Bluepoint Union Free School Dist., 2008 NY Slip Op 10136, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentMarcia Meirowitz sued the Bayport-Bluepoint Union Free School District after losing her contributions that the District transmitted to Horizon Benefits Administration, Inc., its third-party administrator of its retirement savings plan - a Tax… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am by Jani
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Notably, the quotes attributed to the commissioners -- particularly the second excerpt above -- do not explicitly say that the baker should lose because he has religious beliefs, that the religion has been used to horribly oppress people. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
In light of the Court’s decision in Black v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Herrera v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 11:22 am
  If the dentist were in some state of anxiety or upset over the loss of his wife to another man, it is possible he simply botched the job -- perhaps he was not very skillful to begin with and emotional distress caused him to lose what few motor skills he possessed. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, if the losing party does not appeal an adverse judgment in a prior case between the same parties, that party cannot assert the claim in another lawsuit (see Cohen v Glass, 173 AD3d 580, 580 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Rutherford & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2016] EWCA Civ 29 The Court of Appeal tackles the bedroom tax and discrimination again, and, a year on from MA & Ors, there is quite a difference. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:32 pm
The Gambler Who Blew $127 Million [Wall Street Journal] Las Vegas - Harrah's Entertainment - United States - Nevada - Sin City [read post]