Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 40,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2018, 2:47 pm
Dear Readers:I strongly commend to you the recent case, US and State of Florida ex re Ruckh v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:45 am
This exception incorporates the New York Times v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 1:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:20 pm
But, in Sandifer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:40 am
[West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:25 am
But, in Sandifer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Such communications must use the “magic words” articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2006, 8:43 pm
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the case of Bond v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:11 pm
District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, in Amarillo, recently wrote an opinion in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Case citation: Jeppson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
It has been almost easy to forget that the PHH v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:03 am
In other words, the 188 secondary schools in Maryland are divided into four classes based on the number of students attending a school. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:52 pm
In Darin v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:23 am
The case is Crosstex North Texas Pipeline L.P. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
Specifically, in Margueron v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:02 pm
When obvious violations, such as alcohol impairment, are found, detention on tribal authority for delivery to state officials is authorized. [read post]
