Search for: "States v. State" Results 5241 - 5260 of 258,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2007, 2:48 pm
When a defendant exposes himself at such a time and place that a reasonable person knows or should know that his or her act will be observed by others, his or her acts are not accidental and the intent may be inferred.The majority of state courts have concluded that an indecent exposure may be criminalized if it occurs in a private dwelling. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Ronald Mann
After the argument involving Second Amendment rights in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am by INFORRM
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of  R(C) v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 7:49 am by Ben Allen
  Citing language from the obstruction of justice provision, USSG § 2J1.2, dicta in its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:32 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
If they are (as Wilson's study on state R&D tax credits suggests) a zero-sum game in which states or cities are compelled to pay to attract "star scientists," maybe they should be prohibited under the dormant Commerce Clause, as the Sixth Circuit suggested in Cuno v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
    The United States Supreme Court recently limited the ability for defendant's to successfully challenge a suggestive or unreliable identification in Perry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am by CMS
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am by John Jascob
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]