Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 19,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
To the Judge, the similarities between the lists and the circumstances of the case raised a strong inference of copying. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:54 am
Just in time for Valentine's Day.Love v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:12 pm
On Monday, a New Jersey Superior Court wrapped up a fifteen-week trial in Gusciora v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Venancio Aguasanta Arias, et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:54 pm
In the consolidated cases of Bank of America Investment Services, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:18 am
“Pay-per-click websites” (noted the Panel in Business Filings Incorporated v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Reports are staring to come in about today's Supreme Court oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:59 pm
Festo Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
The Federal Circuit used strong language in affirming the decision of the Veterans Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
* Wood v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
Gulp v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
The cases of exclusive jurisdiction within article 24 reflect situations where there is an especially strong and fixed connection between the subject matter of a dispute and the courts of a particular member state. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:36 am
There are strong arguments in favour of a referral of the points in issue to the European Court of Justice, particularly as the interaction between competition law and intellectual property rights remains a complex area. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
Don't forget that the Supreme Court held in Bronston that an answer that is literally true -- even if intentionally misleading -- doesn't count as perjury.If I'm Clinton's lawyer, I would definitely cite today's case from the Ninth Circuit as strong support for his position. [read post]
