Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 8,447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
DHS’s stance was articulated in two memorandums: (1) the Memorandum from Donald Neufeld, Acting Assoc., Dir., Domestic Operations Directorate, et al., to USCIS Field Leadership, at 16, 17 (May 6, 2009), reprinted in 86 Interpreter Releases, No. 20 May 18, 2009, app. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Indian Reservations in the United States: Territory, Sovereignty, and Socioeconomic Change. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Indian Reservations in the United States: Territory, Sovereignty, and Socioeconomic Change. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:27 pm
Museum of Fine Arts and Harvard University et al. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:00 pm
., et al., Nos. 2011-1471, 1472 (Fed. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:49 pm
County of San Diego et al. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:49 pm
County of San Diego et al. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:14 am
So reports Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald: Judge Pohl has set another hearing in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:02 pm
In looking to the future, and some possible further relaxation of the Kennedy statement, Stevens said that the drawing of the line will depend on how a majority of the Court at that time decides what “will best serve the public interest,” rather than “on any proposition of law identified in the Citizens United majority opinion.” Stevens’ speech made no direct mention of the pending case at the Court that appears to be a very important sequel to… [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
With its March 28, 2012 decision in Federal Aviation Administration, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:56 am
Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc. et al. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:16 am
The case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
QuinnDocket: 11-681Issue(s): (1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program are not… [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:07 am
Fraley, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:10 pm
See the opinion in Hedges, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:44 am
This leaves a case open to penalties that may come close to – but probably not meet or exceed- the fines against JPMorgan Chase, et al., in the original agreement. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth became a member of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America effective January 1, 1983. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:52 am
Both the respondents Nortel Networks Inc., et al., and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors have filed a waiver of their right to respond to the petition. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:13 am
United States District Judge William W. [read post]
