Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 6,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 3:17 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 1:41 pm
In reaching its decision: the court: Found that Peachtree's participation in Google's AdWords program and Peachtree's incorporation of Wentworth's marks in Peachtree's keyword meta tags did constitute trademark use under the Lanham Act; Agreed with Wentworth that "initial interest confusion" is actionable under the Lanham Act; Acknowledged, but "respectfully" disagreed with, conflicting authority from other circuits; Specifically… [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:26 pm
The Ninth Circuit stated in Morales v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 9:59 pm
As promised, here are the items I discussed during my two sessions: United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 2:37 pm
In February 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the district court’s ruling on the state secrets privilege issue. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
The demo, for example, is to determine whether "you are eligible for family-sponsored immigration to the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Answer #5 No - Religious Workers may not file Form I-360 with Form I-485 per the recent decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which overturned the permanent injunction issued by the District Court in Ruiz-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Instead, they sued in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, petitioning the court for cancellation of the GOOGLE marks under the Lanham Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm
Solicitor General Elena Kagan will then argue for the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
Menasche, 348 US 528, 538 (1955).Antonin Scalia, Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 79, 94 (1995). [read post]
3 May 2008, 8:05 am
What do I think of the Ninth Circuit's opinion? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Smith, 10-1115, the state petition in the habeas case out of the Ninth Circuit that has now been relisted eleven times. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:42 pm
However, at least two pending cases should clarify whether and when employers must provide seats – a case against Bank of America that is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, and a case against K-Mart that is now being tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 3:39 pm
However, at least two pending cases should clarify whether and when employers must provide seats – a case against Bank of America that is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal, and a case against K-Mart that is now being tried in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reinstated a federal court order blocking the Trump Administration’s so-called Remain in Mexico policy, which would require non-Mexican asylum applicants at the nation’s southern border to wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Lee 15-789Issue: (1) Whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; and (2) whether, when a federal habeas petitioner argues that a state procedural default is not an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim, the burden of persuasion as to adequacy rests on… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:17 am
United States, 195 U.S. 138, 145, 149, and to the consular courts established by concessions from foreign countries, In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453, 464-465, 480. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
Smith 13-946Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to apply the deferential standard of review required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm
Media Law Prof Blog: Ninth Circuit: Downloads “Licensed” Under Eminem’s Contract; Entitled To Fifty Percent Royalties Lexology – The Ninth Circuit’s Eminem license vs sale decision F.B.T. [read post]
