Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 5241 - 5260 of 9,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
In the State of Florida and throughout the United States, children are often injured due to careless supervision. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 12:49 pm by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Every year, a number of individuals in the state of Florida and throughout the United States are injured in automobile accidents caused by drowsy drivers. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
On March 24, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its Opinion in Omnicare, Inc., Et Al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:55 pm by Environmental Law Prof
On March 11, a panel of the Fifth Circuit (Higginbotham, Jones, Prado) issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Pam Devata, John Drury, and Robert Szyba On March 13, 2015, the Solicitor General of the United States filed an amicus brief opposing the petition for writ of certiorari filed in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm by Patti Waller
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
 Fellow Kat Darren, together with his EIP colleague Robert Barker, write up the Idenix v Gilead litigation over whether a document cited as prior art in a patent validity dispute over novelty is entitled to its priority date, on the jiplp weblog here. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
United States, the Supreme Court read the Constitution as forbidding Congress from “commandeering” a state legislature by obligating it to enact a law. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 287 U.S. 435, 458-59 (1932) (separate opinion of Justice Roberts); Sherman v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]