Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 5241 - 5260
of 19,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm
The question arose in the case of Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif, a citizen of the United Arab Emirates, who came to the United States on a student visa but was dismissed from school – and, as a result, was no longer in the country legally. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Posted by , on Friday, January 11, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 4–10, 2019. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Below is a brief summary of issues before the Court last week: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
Pak examined what Kim Jong-Un’s New Year’s address and his trip to China this week means for North Korea, the United States’ relationship with South Korea and Beijing’s willingness to enforce sanctions. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:16 pm
Amongst other questions raised, but not decided, by the opinion are whether aliens who are in the United States without authorization are included in the phrase "the people" to whom various rights are given under the Constitution. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Or.); U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:36 am
Notably, the government’s argument echoes the argument by amici (including one of us) in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
Matthew Kahn shared the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
Weeks, Sale v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
Four subjects were involved with planned attacks in the United States inspired by or in support of the Islamic State. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
United States, the justices declined to decide whether Apprendi applies to criminal restitution – here, an order requiring two men to pay over $300,000 in restitution to CitiGroup. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
Nr 6 of the list, The EPO’s Vision (V) – Trust, was a sad display of what this principle meant to Battistelli: ‘… if trust is supposed to be the EPO’s vision, why does the EPO President apparently believe the EPO needs an “investigative unit” (aka as “Stasi” in examiners’ speech)? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
For a complete list, see Transforming Document Recordation at the United States Copyright Office, pp. 13-14 (2014). which is less complex than the registration system and which the Office began working on earlier. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., the Supreme Court of Canada stated, 91 The contract of employment has many characteristics that set it apart from the ordinary commercial contract. [read post]
