Search for: "v. " Results 5241 - 5260 of 493,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
An advance alert from Oxford Journal brings word of the posting of Judicial Intervention in Early Corporate Governance Disputes: Vice-Chancellor Shadwell’s Lost Judgment in Mozley v Alston (1847), by Victoria Barnes in the American Journal of Legal History:Mozley v Alston is usually used in Anglo-American corporate law as an authority to demonstrate the premise that courts are reluctant to intervene in disputes between shareholders and directors. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:05 pm
In this final episode of the Media CAT saga (Media CAT v Adams No, 4 [2011] EPC 10) His Honour Judge Birss QC decided who was to pay for episodes 1, 2 and 3. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 2:49 am
Author User:Jynto Licence CCO 1.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Teva UK Ltd [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) (26 April 2022)This was an application by  Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd., the proprietor of European patent (UK)  3,103,443, and Flynn Pharma Limited, Neurim's exclusive licensee, for an interim injunction [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Pippa Rogerson (Cambridge University) has written a short casenote in the latest issue of the Cambridge Law Journal on the judgment of the House of Lords in Harding v Wealands [2006] UKHL 32. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:40 pm
I just posted (here in PDF) the final, and largest brief submitted on behalf of plaintiff/respondent in Betancourt v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:26 am by sally
Joddrell v Peaktone Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1035; [2012] WLR (D) 229 “The deeming provision, as to the restoration of a company to the Register of Companies, contained within section 1032(1) of the Companies Act 2006, was apt retrospectively to validate an action commenced by or against a company during the period of its dissolution.” WLR Daily, 26th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:40 am
London Court of International ArbitrationAuthor Mar9254 Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commmons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords justices Lewison, Popplewell and Birss) S3D Interactive Inc v Oovee Ltd [2022] WLR(D) 516, [2022] EWCA Civ 1665This was an appeal against the decision of Mr Justice Butcher to enforce a peremptory order of an arbitrator under s.42 of the Arbitration Act 1996 [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:53 pm
curid=1584721 Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Birss) Illumina Cambridge Ltd v Latvia MGI Tech SIA and others [2021] EWHC 57 (Pat) (20 Jan 2021)This was an action for patent infringement and a counterclaim for revocation. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:22 am by Jamison Koehler
Read More The post Storming the Capitol in Larson-Olson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 12:18 pm by David Honig
…Read more Case Review: Christie’s v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:10 pm
Author Arpingstone Public Domain Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Hugh Sims QC) easyGroup Limited v Easylife Limited and another [2021] EWHC 1705 (Ch) (11 June 2021)This was a pretrial review of a trade mark infringement and passing off action before Mr Hugh Sims QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:44 am
Here's the vast, 450-paragraph judgment of Andrew Smith J in OFT v Abbey and others, a judgment that will depress those poor banks even more, though it will cheer up money saving experts, impoverished law students, poor pupil barristers and wealthy banking litigation partners. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:31 am
In Community Trade Marks: Specsavers v ASDA 7 Feb 2012 NIPC Law I analysed the litigation that had taken place between two well known retailers in which the Court of Appeal considered how far an aggressive marketing campaign can go without infringing trade mark law. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:30 am
NielsF / CC BY-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) Jane Lambert Queen's Bench Division (Mr Justice Griffiths) DSN v Blackpool Football Club Ltd [2020] EWHC 670 (QB) (20 March 2020) Paragraph 8 of the Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols which I discussed in Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols Update on 12 Oct 2019 advises: " [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:25 am by tracey
Regina v Ayhan: [2011] WLR (D)  366 “An inaccurate memorandum of conviction committing a defendant to the Crown Court for sentence would not affect the validity of the committal provided the magistrates’ court had been vested with the necessary jurisdiction.” WLR Daily, 13th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]