Search for: "A John Doe Corporation"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 5,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 3:35 pm
” Fundamentally, a derivative claim “does not belong to the shareholder asserting it. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 12:01 pm
With his blog The Legal Thing, Mike does more than your average GC to encourage corporate transparency: by using the tools of a successful blogger (linking in/out, encouraging reader comments and writing on a wide range of issues), he is helping offer the public a glimpse into how Sun operates. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
In this regard, the Washington law does crea [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
by John L. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IP ThinkTank), When does the patent expire? [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:30 am
Though both are common, the company does not condone such uses of its trademark, and is particularly concerned about the ongoing use of Xerox as a verb as this places the trademark in danger of being declared a generic word by the courts. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:11 am
Does "loophole closing" count as a tax hike? [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:13 am
This begs the question - does Barack Obama do negative branding? [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:54 am
A9998
Pretlow (MS) -- Relates to racing corporations and associations; simulcasting and imposition of certain taxes Same as Uni. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Does Bentzen hate herself? [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
Clearly, Obama is trying to make some inroads with John Edwards supporters, as Ben Muse notes here. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 8:35 pm
But as he rides off he does ask himself whether Mad Kane is right. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:48 am
A White Paper By John D. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 2:59 pm
It also does not include a telecom amnesty provision. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:08 am
The Customs and Border Protection defends the searches, saying the agency does not need to show probable cause to look inside suitcases or laptops. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:55 pm
(For a more extensive discussion, which also defends contracting to clarify rules doctrine leaves uncertain, see John Steele, Corporate Affiliate Conflicts: a Reasonable Expectation Test, 29 W. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:49 am
For instance, a pool does not necessarily add value because “some buyers like it, some don’t. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
And does your firm listen to its young? [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
In this schema, lawyers report directly to nonlawyers, and in cases where the client is someone other than the employer, the attorney owes a duty of loyalty to them both. [31] Many observers state pragmatically that for all intents and purposes, the MDP revolution has already arrived in relation to corporate practice. [32] Indeed, by the numbers, Arthur Andersen was the biggest employer of lawyers in the United States in 2000. [33] … [read post]
