Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 5261 - 5280 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Bankruptcy, Biglaw, Clawback agreements, Clawback provisions, Clawbacks, Colleen McMahon, Coudert Brothers, Dissolution, Jewel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
(See, for example, his much-admired book The Ghost of Jim Crow: How Southern Moderates Used Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 7:16 am by SCOTUSblog
Hasen & Dahlia Lithwick, Slate) Descendants asking US Supreme Court to rename Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:50 am by nwlc
And yesterday, the Ninth Circuit announced that it would not review en banc the panel decision in Perry v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 5:11 pm by Robert Vonada
The District Court held the subrogation claim was barred by Section 1720 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.The Third Circuit identified Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by Harold O'Grady
While attending BLS, Gideon was selected for the law school’s competitive Edward V. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:21 am by John Diekman
Browne, NY Slip Op 01811 (2d Dept. 2012).Here is the decision.Tomorrow’s issue: Bankruptcy petitions. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 2nd Circuit, Bankruptcy, Biglaw, California, Chapter 7, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Clawback agreements, Clawback provisions, Clawbacks, Colleen McMahon, Coudert Brothers, Dissolution, Jewel v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:00 pm by azatty
The 50-year anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
Brown, S238309.CJLF has this press release.We have press coverage from Maura Dolan in the L.A. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Meanwhile, yesterday the Justices heard argument in Uttecht v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:45 am by jlutz99
  The decision was based mainly on a legal ground that neither side in the case believed remained in issue — the sufficiency of the DNA evidence, under Jackson v. [read post]