Search for: "Daniel v. Daniel"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 7,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2022, 7:38 pm
US v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 10:47 am
Sept. 10, 2013), Judge Daniel Knowles of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
The '188 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Shin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (RPD) held that Article 1F(b) of the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of … Daniels et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
From Flores v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:46 pm
Parisi v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Based on those rulings, the federal government carried out its first execution in 17 years when it put Daniel Lee to death at around 8 a.m. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
Daniel P. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Ansell Limited v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:57 am
Ross, CPA, Christopher Kelly, CPA, Daniel Stieglitz, CPA, Vera Krupnick, CPA, Riz Ann F. [read post]
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Orders Money Mart to Pay $30,000 for Failure to Investigate Harassment
24 Feb 2010, 7:39 pm
Daniel & Krumeh, 2009 HRTO 1824 (CanLII), 2009 HRTO 1824 (CanLII) and Hill-Leclair v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
Tony Mauro at the BLT offers a new perspective on the grant — from Daniel Petrocelli, Skilling's attorney. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
R. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
The '188 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Shin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court in Angle Joe Perrie Vasquez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Should you have any questions about the contents of this note, please contact Daniel E. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:20 am
As with the plan invalidated in Biden v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
Danielle Citron: who do we care about? [read post]
