Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 5261 - 5280 of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2012, 8:24 am by Rob
Your use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Phillip J. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
Michigan’s 2014 law, Public Act 508 (H. 5418), does not extend to spouses. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
He writes: What does Section 324 say about the rule of law today and the history from which it has taken root? [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 9:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not impose a "public use" requirement on eminent domain does not mean that such limitations cannot be found under state constitutions. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 6:45 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
While Lawson and BEermann may not agree with Luttig and Rivkin on every particular, they agree on a central point: Congress does not have the authority to second-guess the electoral votes submitted by states, and those members of the House and Senate who sought to argue otherwise were endeavoring to violate the Constitution. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 12:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
While the Supreme Court does not grant certiorari all that often, this would seem like a strong candidate. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:47 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Even if that report is taken at face value, it does not support the President's or Vice President's statements. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
—9/6/18 BREAKING: District Court Judge in Texas Holds ACA Is Unlawful—12/14/18 What the Lawless Obamacare Ruling Means (w/ Abbe Gluck), New York Times, 12/15/18 Understanding Why Judge O'Connor Was Wrong to Conclude Plaintiffs Had Standing to Challenge the Penalty-Less Individual Mandate—12/21/18 Court Stays Ruling Invalidating the Affordable Care Act Pending Appeal—12/31/18 Justice Department Revises Its Position in Texas ACA Case—3/25/19 Does… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The pattern in the Chief Justice's votes is fairly clear: He does not like injunctions. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 12:18 pm
Moreover, the relevant legislative history does not demonstrate that Congress intended to limit the premium tax credit to State Exchanges. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
What does it mean that the Chief Justice asked the other justices "in some form"? [read post]