Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 5261 - 5280 of 16,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
Svantesson Panelists: Amy Keating - Senior Legal Director, Twitter Uta Kohl - Senior Lecturer, Aberystwyth School of Law, Aberystwyth University Lea Bishop Shaver - Professor of Law at Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Chesney
The Supreme Court held that the district court did not have the power to enjoin the transfers, explaining that “[h]abeas corpus does not require the United States to shelter . . . fugitives from the criminal justice system of the sovereign with authority to prosecute them. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:11 am by Trish Higgins
The trial court granted summary adjudication, reasoning that, because Kim settled and dismissed his individual claims, he “was no longer suffering from an infringement or denial of his legal rights … [and] [h]is rights have been completely redressed. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:49 am
He's fielding the question on the fly after winning the Screen Actors Guild Award for his role in the TV show "Shameless. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 8:43 am by Zuri Blackmon
” Coverage was denied at Aspiro on grounds that “[t]his is an unproven and experimental type of treatment [and h]er care could have occurred in an intensive outpatient program. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
But it does prohibit States from doing, in the context of "use tax" collection, what it does for "sales tax" collection, viz., requiring the sellers to collect the tax that is owed by the buyer and to remit the proceeds to Illinois - unless the seller maintains some "physical presence" in Illinois. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by SHG
What does this mean for you? [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am by David Post
But it does prohibit States from doing, in the context of "use tax" collection, what it does for "sales tax" collection, viz., requiring the sellers to collect the tax that is owed by the buyer and to remit the proceeds to Illinois - unless the seller maintains some "physical presence" in Illinois. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Robert Chesney
True, Congress has passed a statute limiting repeat petitions challenging a criminal conviction (see 28 USC 2255(h)). [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm by Eszter Szakács
C-392/97, Farmitalia, C-127/00, Hässle) but – in the authors’ opinion – never so far with such clarity to its direct relevance to the provisions of the other SPC regulation as in this case. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
This exception does require that Medicare approved the eyeglasses or contact lenses. [read post]