Search for: "English v. English" Results 5261 - 5280 of 11,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 11:57 am by Steven Eversole
Defendant, who recently resigned his position, had been working at this particular school for six years as an English teacher. [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:57 am by Steven Eversole
Defendant, who recently resigned his position, had been working at this particular school for six years as an English teacher. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:22 am
Finally, since ‘noval’ did not belong to the English language, the relevant public would not know exactly how to pronounce it: this precluded a presumption that the word would be pronounced with the same rhythm and intonation as the ‘Wine in’ part of 'Wine in Black'. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:05 am by Dan Ernst
Doug Coulson, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of English, has posted British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Social studies and English teachers are watching Wolf Hall on PBS. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 1: Audiovisual works – educational uses – colleges and universitiesThis proposed class would allow college and university faculty and students to circumvent access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures and other audiovisual works for purposes of criticism and comment. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
Subsequent court decisions have confirmed the traditionally liberal English view of what can constitute a signature including, for instance, typing one’s name at the end of an e-mail. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:09 am by Tamsin Blow, Olswang LLP
Olswang LLP acted for the Interveners, English PEN, Article 19 and Index on Censorship, at the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Carbone v Whidden, 2015 ABCA 161 [14] However, this maze of affidavits does prove two things. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  They carefully considered the historical context of the decision in Wilkinson v Downton. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
Home being defined as an ordinary english word. [read post]