Search for: "Fail v. State" Results 5261 - 5280 of 66,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2017, 2:40 pm by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
When state and local authorities fail to properly correct a hazardous roadway condition or are negligent in the design of the road itself, it may be possible for an injured driver to recover damages. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Maltz (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School) has posted Failed Quest: The Unsuccessful Effort to Reconcile Brown With Originalist Theory (American Journal of Law and Equality, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 7:07 am by John Jascob
Following a bench trial in the DRW case, the judge rejected the CFTC’s theory of manipulation, stating that it was “only the CFTC’s Enforcement Division that has persisted in its cry of market manipulation, based on little more than an ‘earth is flat’-style conviction that such manipulation must have happened because the market remained illiquid. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Dwight Sullivan
On Thursday, ACCA is hearing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:30 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The panel stated that the issues of appropriate damages for a failure to complete the audit was entirely separate from the issue of damages that would be appropriate for a delay in completing the audit. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Consequently, plaintiff's opposition papers failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to medical necessity (see Bronze Acupuncture, P.C. v Mercury Ins. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:33 pm by Brian A. Comer
A defendant who fails to bargain is not rewarded with the privilege of fashioning and ultimately extracting a benefit from the decisions of those who do.Id. at 197, 777 S.E.2d at 831 (quoting Lard v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:47 am by John Jascob
The Commission could not compel former bank employees to divulge the secret passcodes they devised for smartphones issued to them by their former bank employer because the codes were the employees’ personal thought processes and not business records that can be compelled over Fifth Amendment objection (SEC v. [read post]