Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 5,359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
" Because the case of Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 11:32 am
Webb v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
The problem is that, like prescription medical products, guns are unavoidably dangerous. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:13 pm
When an actor fires a gun in the midst of the Mojave Desert, he intends to pull the trigger; but when the bullet hits a person who is present in the desert without the actor's knowledge, he does not intend that result. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:22 pm
Woodley then observed a number of cased guns in the vehicle. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
Reed v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 10:26 pm
Refac Int'l, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
Looking in a gun case was reasonable. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
Bell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:54 pm
But instead of punching a wall, he takes out a gun and shoots her unoccupied car (and takes an ice pick to one of the tires).N0t a good thing, obviously. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Texas (06-984, cert. docs) and Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
A217A Pheffer (MS) -- Establishes the identity theft prevention and mitigation unit
No Same as
BLURB : Exec. identy theft prev mitgn unt
First Act: 01/03/07 referred to consumer affairs and protection
Last Act: 04/17/07 reported referred to ways and means
A2619 McDonough (MS) -- Requires electronic monitoring for certain sex offenders
No Same as
BLURB : Cor. elctrnc mntrng crtn sx ofndr
First Act:… [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeProbationer's Diminished Privacy Expectation, Reasonable Suspicion Justified Search Revealing Gun United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
" Does this text imply an individual right to own and use guns? [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Grimaldi, 993 F.2d 1002, 1004-05 (1st Cir. 1993) (holding that a New Hampshire State Prison practice of requiring nonprivileged outgoing mail to be submitted for inspection in unsealed envelopes does not violate prisoners' constitutional rights); Smith v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 3:51 am
Without more, this does not amount to a constructive entry. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
An 1886 decision (Presser v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:48 pm
It's Ford v. [read post]
