Search for: "HALL v. HALL"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 6,289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2009, 4:58 am
After the U.S Supreme Court's decision in Hall Street Associates L.L.C. v Mattel, Inc., there's some doubt about whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act, you can vacate an arbitration award from an arbitrator who manifestly disregarded the law . [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
One such case, in May of this year and out of the Eastern District of Virginia is Hall & Wilson Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:56 am
(IP Think Tank) US Copyright – Decisions Tenenbaum found guilty of wilful copyright infringement, hit with $675,000 fine (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The IP Factor) (Excess Copyright) (Public Knowledge) (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Amazon hit with class action lawsuit over Kindle deletion (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (EFF) Associated Press – Rights… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:49 am
In JPM and ors v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:22 pm
Because Victoria and I have both written fairly extensively about Hall Street Assoc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:05 pm
Ditto Judge Soto in Malone v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
C. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
Hall And Shaw Sales, Marketing, & Consulting LLC, 600 F. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
Here's a paraphrase of what those judges said:The parties dispute whether the Supreme Court's recent decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 7:08 am
United Statse v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 7:11 pm
The title of this post is the title of this new article available via SSRN by Bradley Hall. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:58 pm
And he's able to find an alleged ambiguity in the ERISA Plan documents that you could argue makes the Plan ambiguous -- and hence, resolving ambiguities in favor of the insured, creating coverage.Judge Hall says that the Plan's nonetheless clear and doesn't provide coverage. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:17 pm
Norwood v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:14 am
New York State Court of Claims: DePaula v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 9:41 am
As I said in my earlier posting:But the main problem with the fair dealing issue may have been that the Educators had agreed at an early stage of these proceedings to a survey methodology that resulted in evidence that by their later admission "needs to be collected differently" in light of the CCH v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
Well, it was too hard for Judge Reemberto Diaz, who gets into the hall of shame for his failure to do just that in Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:06 am
But the instruction isn't supposed to work that way, and I see little reason to reverse on the ground that the decision would be different because if the court had given the right instruction we're pretty sure the jury wouldn't have accurately followed the law.In short, this is a case that takes me way back to the 20th century, sitting in Torts in Austin Hall and learning a little bit of Latin. [read post]
