Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 5261 - 5280 of 6,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm by NL
Briefly, Mr Howe and his then wife were joint secure tenants of Tower Hamlets. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm by NL
Briefly, Mr Howe and his then wife were joint secure tenants of Tower Hamlets. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Jeramie J. Fortenberry, LL.M.
The Mississippi Court of Appeals held that the husband and wife failed in their claim of adverse possession and consequently needed to remove their fixtures from their neighbors land. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:42 am by Laurence J. Cutler
On one set of motions, the former wife requested a change of custody and the husband cross-moved for reimbursement of certain expenses for the child involved. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 9:51 am by admin
 In this case, the divorce judge did not err in finding personal jurisdiction over husband pursuant to the long-arm statute based on allegations in wife’s complaint that  i) husband deserted her on specific date; ii) husband’s desertion had continued since that date without interruption and husband has not returned to the matrimonial domicile iii) wife was domiciled in and a bonafide resident of Virginia; iv)… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm by John Culhane
Section 3 reads: In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 pm by Howard Friedman
That section provides that in interpreting any federal statute or regulation, "the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:43 pm by pfriedman
A federal court in Massachusetts today struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), which states that for purposes of determining rights to federal benefits “the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ’spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am by Christelle Vaval
Generally, courts have considered solicitor-and-client, husband and wife, priest and penitent and doctor and patient communications as privileged ones. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:36 am by sally
Metropolitan Housing Trust v Hadjazi [2010] EWCA Civ 750; [2010] WLR (D) 167 “The jurisdiction of the court to grant a social landlord a possession order against an assured tenant, the husband, under ground 14A in Pt II of Sch 2 to the Housing Act 1988 on the basis of the husband’s domestic violence or threat of violence against the wife, extended to violence and threats proved to have taken place after the husband had left the dwelling house… [read post]