Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 5261 - 5280 of 15,745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 12:33 pm by Vishnu Kannan
So how would you deal with the millions of immigrants who arrive legally but overstay their visas? [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:40 pm by Irina Manta
Last month, the Trump Administration announced a new rule that could cut legal immigration in half by denying visas and permanent residency to people for being too poor. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Lisa Stam
Reg. 285/01: WHEN WORK DEEMED TO BE PERFORMED, EXEMPTIONS AND SPECIAL RULES. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
With its emphasis on lasting relationships, respect for the natural world, building consensus, and on making and maintaining peace, it stands in contrast to legal systems based on property, resource exploitation, and majority rule. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Philip K. Howard
Forest rangers used to do their jobs quite well, guided by a thin pamphlet of rules. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 7:28 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Says Trump Can Bar Asylum Seekers While Legal Fight Continues”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm by Leti Volpp
Thus, interdiction provides an opportunity to examine “one of the central animating dynamics of liberal constitutionalism[,]” the tension between the constraining legalities valorized as the rule of law, and the desire for flexible expression of sovereign will (p. 5). [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 9:21 am by opedit
While you can protect your home equity from liquidation and temporarily stop foreclosure, you’re still required to continue making payments on the home. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
First, we’re not sure about the anti-competitive implications of this case. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
  The postings will be listed in reverse chronological order.This post continues a multi-part examination of one of the central elements of the Draft Legally Binding Instrument (DLBI)--Article 4 (Rights of Victims). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Democrats indicated they were continuing to expand the scope of their investigation into whether to impeach the president beyond the special counsel’s core findings on Russian election interference and possible presidential obstruction of justice. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:46 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  She was brought up on ethics rules violations for violating Rule 1.6 (Client Confidentiality) and Rule 1.9 (Rules regarding former clients). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
He continues to submit that in this instance it is not possible to allow for a politician to give independent expert evidence. 1546: David Johnston QC refers to the case law discussing non justiciability. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm by Jean O'Grady
  “We’re excited to roll this out to our existing law firm, insurance, advocacy and corporate clients so they can make data-supported litigation decisions,” said Merrill. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:46 am by Jen Yackley
The rule also provides that a person has to continue to meet all the DSM-5 criteria for PTSD in order to be eligible for additional treatment. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here’s an excerpt: Law firms are beginning to contemplate whether corporate boards will continue to be entitled to the deference afforded by the business judgment rule – which broadly shields directors from liability as long as they’re deemed to have acted in the corporation’s interest – if their decisions are prompted by rationales other than maximizing profits. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:28 am by opadmin
  Questions and concerns should be reviewed with a legal expert. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
In order to poke a hole into the exclusionary rights of patent holders (in that regard, Germany is even out of compliance with EU law), they resorted to an old Roman-law doctrine ("dolo agit qui petit quod statim redditurus est") that means you're not allowed to claim what you'd have to return immediately for some other legal reason. [read post]