Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 5261 - 5280 of 10,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
Following the Upper Tribunal judgment in SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) [our report], the DWP has issued a Circular - HB U6/2014 The thing is that it isn't quite right, in some quite important ways. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells provided a video of this week’s oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 4:34 am by Jon Gelman
Circuit's decision “expressly contradicted” the Supreme Court's landmark mandamus-related ruling in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Jon Gelman
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:32 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1587; [2013] EWHC 3777 (Admin)   The Supreme Court had to consider if it should depart from the previous House of Lords judgment in R (James & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice following the ECtHR ruling in James v UK when considering the joined appeals relating to prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for public protection or life imprisonment. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:05 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
Shortly after this Statute’s enactment, our state’s Supreme Court in Painter v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
”In an interview with The Windsor Star, James Cooke, the local lawyer who represented Diemer, said the appeal court’s decision could spell the beginning of the end for the billable hour. [read post]