Search for: "Kat" Results 5261 - 5280 of 6,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
With other Kats, perhaps, such things would not have been inducements; but as for me, I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
Even though most of us -- even Kats -- are actually named by our parents or owners, and most people go through phases of wanting to change them (our names, that is, not our parents or owners), the thought that someone has exclusionary rights in them can be deeply troubling. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Andrew Berger
Last year Greenpeace attacked Nestlé for buying palm oil (a key ingredient of their Kit-Kat bars) from companies that destroy the rainforests. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
 The Kat congratulates CIPA on this important initiative and hopes that it will persevere. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:18 am
Last Monday, this Kat attended the 2011 Brands Lecture, organised by the British Brands Group. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm
What in the world is this Kat grousing about? [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
The Kat would probably have left it for a bit longer, were it not for a nudge from Mike Lynd (Mark & Clerk). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
Richard wrote to the AmeriKat this week with the following comments on this topic and of which he has kindly allowed the Kat to publish: "Thank you for this report on IBIL's Annual Hugh Laddie Lecture last week, and the kind words in it to the unintendedly anonymous contributor on the lack of transparency of member states’ observations on CJEU references. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
 This Kat wonders why. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
Pressed by the Kat to spill the beans on all the behind-the-scenes information that makes these cases so much fun, Isabel would not be drawn into anything less discreet than the tactful observation that "the judge looked very carefully at the evidence when he came to this conclusion, granting summary judgment. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
(4) Article 10(1)(a) of Directive 2006/115 and of Directive 92/100 is to be interpreted to the effect that a hotel or a guesthouse operator which uses a phonogram for communication to the public does not make private use of it and an exception to the right to equitable remuneration under Article 8(2) of Directive 2006/115 is not possible even if the use by the customer in his bedroom has private character".There's a lot to read in this Opinion and this Kat hasn't had time… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:12 am
"  Last night the number of registrants for the 1709 Blog's Copyright Debate on 12 July, supported by this Kat, reached the amazing total of 200. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:56 am
Once the court has handed down a decision, the Kats will of course let you know. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:17 am
Class 30: tapioca, sago [one member of the Kat family, having experienced these products in his youth, has always been puzzled as to why they've been classed as foods. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
All these top levels have the Kat in a spin! [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
The tussle between Nokia and IPCom has reached the courts once again and is, in the mind of this Kat at least, beginning to appear a little like the legal equivalent of UK TV uber-serial Eastenders - not quite up there with the Coronation Street-like behemoth of the Chiron v Organon litigation in the 1990s, of which this Kat seems to recall at least 14 decisions, but nevertheless still on its way to epic status. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
These musings have been sparked off by the timely appearance (is it coincidence or cunning, the Kat wonders?) [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
Emerging, blinking, from the dark confines of the pile of examination scripts that he has called his home for the past few weeks (which in the best cases have been a joy to behold and in the worst a veritable papier-mâché bunker of Babel), this Kat has spent a rather pleasant afternoon easing himself back into the real world again by digesting the latest judgment from Mr Justice Floyd: Cephalon v Orchid & Mylan [2011] EWHC 1591 (Pat).Cephalon and its subsidiaries owned the… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
You can often find very interesting IP articles hidden away in titles that aren't generally known for their in-depth IP coverage, as this Kat has occasionally mentioned. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:01 pm
This Kat however has some sympathy for Ms Herrman. [read post]