Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 36,768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am
The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 am
The Court succinctly summarised the matter as "generally, on a fair reading of ss. 15(1)(b) and 15(1)(c), a patent can be granted to a legal person for an invention with an artificial intelligence system or device as the inventor".Ultimately what the case focused on is whether a valid patent application has been made, rather than who will own any patent that might be granted in the future. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 9:07 pm
Robinson was settled out of court fairly quickly, before the court could issue any dispositive rulings in the matter. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial… [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Referring to studies, without qualification, as admissible in themselves is usually wrong as a matter of evidence law. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Simek and Michael C. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:22 pm
A good defense lawyer will approach each matter with respect for its own unique characteristics. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
” On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
”On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Craig Williams is joined by Mark Fenster, the Stephen C. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
(2) Matters to be included. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:01 am
Starling, 315 NE 2d 163 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist. 1974 No matter who gets called to interpret, they must swear an oath that they are interpreting fully and accurately. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter of Bonacorsa v Van… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In 1976, the legislature enacted Correction Law article 23-A and Executive Law § 296 (15) in furtherance of 'the 'general purposes' of the Penal Law,' including ''the rehabilitation of those convicted' and 'the promotion of their successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society' (Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 16 NY3d 309, 314 [2011], quoting Penal Law § 1.05 [6]; see Matter of Bonacorsa v Van… [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:40 pm
Stevenson also referenced Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v Boutiques Cliquot Lige (2006 SCC 23) at paragraph 20 where Justice Binnie articulated that: “[t]he test to be applied is a matter of first impression in the mind of a casual consumer somewhat in a hurry who sees the name… and does not pause to give the matter any detailed consideration or scrutiny, nor to examine closely the similarities and differences between the marks. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 3596(c) and Atkins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:05 am
Sources: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/fa/htm/fa.71.htm file:///C:/Users/kao12/AppData/Local/Temp/texas.pdfRead More [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 8:13 am
by Michael C. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 12:57 pm
Does this matter substantively? [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 10:34 am
It shows a fairly steady rate of increase throughout the period, with no particular inflection point for CTB's adoption at the end of 1996 (or for the enactment of section 954(c)(6) in 2005). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:24 am
The prior legal regime for classifying, say, limited liability companies (LLCs) under state law had grown to combine tedious burden creation with near-electivity as an effective matter, plus an almost complete lack for the government to try to police the boundary (given, for example, publicly traded partnerships were being taxed as C corporations anyway).The tricky part that may have reflected a Treasury stumble occurred in the international realm. [read post]
