Search for: "Mark A. Roberts" Results 5261 - 5280 of 10,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Absurd punitive damages judgments will be fewer as a result of this absolutely correct decision by the new Roberts-led United States Supreme Court.It is a court burdened by the legacy of an ineffectual and inconsistent Rehnquist Court, whose main mark is "unfinished business" in a legal system left in turmoil, lagging far behind modern technological developments and unprepared judicially for the digital age. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
If you would like more information on cerebral palsy please visit our website and as always, if you have any questions please feel free to contact me: E-mail: robert@dioriofirm.com Phone: (888) 456-4658 SOUTH CAROLINA UCP AFFILIATE UCP affiliates provide direct services to individuals and families with cerebral palsy and other disabilities. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Recent Roberts Court cases dealing with mini-Blaine Amendments are fascinating arenas of combat. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
If you've followed the Roberts Court for a while, you probably weren't too surprised to hear that the Loper Bright v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
" Later in the day, at the daily White House press briefing, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had an exchange that also addressed the cap and trade issue. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm by Marie Louise
Graphic Management Associates, Inc (Docket Report) Merely being a ‘sophisticated company’ does not impute an ‘intent to deceive’ for false marking claim: Herengracht Group LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am by Stefanie Levine
The law of false marking requires improper marking with the intent to deceive the public. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am by Stefanie Levine
The law of false marking requires improper marking with the intent to deceive the public. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
“Today, we reject such a sweeping interpretation of (c)(2),” Roberts says. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Dan McLaughlin observes that “the case also likely marks a long-overdue death blow to openly anti-Catholic Blaine amendments adopted by many states in the 1870s and 1880s and defended by anti-religious progressives and public-school teachers’ unions to this day. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:23 am by Clifford Winston
Moreover, the Roberts court has become much more polarized along ideological voting lines than the court under former Chief Justice William Rehnquist. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that the justices also granted a request by an unnamed corporation to file a cert petition under seal in a case arising out of a subpoena thought to be connected to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:09 pm by Mary Moynihan
Carpenter and Mark Bonin II posit that the FTC should be flexible in enforcing provisions against influencers. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
Moreover, once HRW itself became a story following Robert Bernstein’s article, it was bizarre to tell reporters they couldn’t cite HRW’s leading Israeli critic. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am by SHG
Do not be shocked if the Roberts court announces next June that it will, in effect, split the difference between Justices Marshall and Powell, permitting affirmative action to reach the five-decade mark. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:17 am by Marcia Coyle
This term has marked the beginning of a “new” Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:43 am by Goldberg Jones
Fun fact: Babe Ruth plays himself, as do Gehrig’s Yankee teammates Bob Meusel, Mark Koenig, and Bill Dickey. [read post]