Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
Natural disasters like the earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, our dysfunctional Congress, and wrecked housing and employment economies do make it difficult to feel light about it.That's why I was glad to see someone as prominent in the food safety community as Mark Bittman recently penning "Six Things to Feel Good About" for his New York Times blog. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:44 pm
The Circuit Court’s refusal to change its holding in “Kiyemba I” has led to the new petition in “Kiyemba III. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Argentina. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The treaties mark a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and OECS Countries. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:26 pm
Sanders said, “It is absolutely unconscionable that in the year 2011 the Congress is debating amendments to gut the Clean Air Act and I am going to fight back. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
Further, the Constitution specifically limits "Congress," not the courts. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:59 pm
This analysis misses the mark in four critical ways. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
at *3 (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
I want to thank Senator Gillibrand and Congressman Nadler for their hard work on this new legislation. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 am
I am making the argument that the suspension of Section 8 of Article I as if it is possible to amend the Constitution with a wink and nod represents a mortal threat to the republic. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
To oversimplify as least slightly, nuclear power accidents have been marked, over the past half-century, by relative infrequency, and their actual severity has been, while serious, not insurmountable. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 11:17 am
When I suggest a less ambitious registry than ARROW or the Google Registry that was never born, I am thinking that there are certain kinds of cultural goods — photography is an obvious example — where there are unique problems in marking the work in a way that permits easy identification of the rights holder. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
I conclude that it is not. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
The only exceptions would have to be passed by two-thirds majorities in both houses of Congress. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:08 am
Meredith Cross, David Becker, Steve Cutler, Mark Cahn, Joseph Brenner). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:42 pm
Shouldn't this be up to Congress or the Supreme Court? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:40 pm
This bill is the logical next step in Congress effort to protect our young athletes from brain injuries. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
I look to certain variables, including the type of court deciding a case, whether the litigants live in the state where the judge sits, the political party of the judge or the person who appointed them, and factors which correlate with ideology like race and gender.Id. at 747. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:02 am
No more wars without consulting Congress. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
That is for younger people (I am 71) who want to make a mark. [read post]
