Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5261 - 5280
of 21,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm
SCOTUS Decision The Brunetti case follows an earlier decision, Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
Justice Kagan with opinion in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
” The first is United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:52 am
Supreme Court today in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
This week on Capitol Hill and vicinity, the Supreme Court issues its decision in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:15 am
This week on Capitol Hill and vicinity, the Supreme Court issues its decision in Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
In Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:28 am
Consistent with the Second, Sixth, and Eighth circuit courts’ holdings, the 7th Circuit held in Richardson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” Mark Walsh has an first-hand look at Friday’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm
As the majority points out, the graves of those who died in WWI were marked with either a cross or a star of David. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:42 am
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Flowers v. [read post]