Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5261 - 5280 of 21,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm by Mark Nieds
SCOTUS Decision The Brunetti case follows an earlier decision, Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm by Brett Trout
” Given the Lanham Act’s prohibition on registering immoral and scandalous matter, the examiner at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Brunetti’s application for registration, as did the USPTO’s Trade-mark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
Consistent with the Second, Sixth, and Eighth circuit courts’ holdings, the 7th Circuit held in Richardson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has an first-hand look at Friday’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As the majority points out, the graves of those who died in WWI were marked with either a cross or a star of David. [read post]