Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 7,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
Marie Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am
The United States Supreme Court enunciated this presumption in Troxel v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:55 pm
Being very fond of both yoghurt and children, the IPKat has long taken an interest in Case C? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:21 pm
P. 34(a)(1)(A). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We did that not too long ago and came up with a new law review article, Samuel Raymond, “Judicial Politics & Medical Device Preemption After Riegel,” 5 N.Y.U.J.L. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
How long? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 pm
M-M-M-Mildred Loving (Loving v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:10 am
If your country is one of them, the time to start campaigning has long passed -- but it's not too late to put things right for the future! [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
” In Thompson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
Backstory: Campbell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:53 pm
Seattle School District No. 1 and Ricci v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[vi] If an individual is going to err deciding the layoff rights of an employee, it is likely to involve some confusion of status involving the three “P” words: permanent, probationer and provisional. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Vacaville, 19 Cal.4th 925, 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 811, 968 P.2d 522, 534 (1988) (observing the ‘commonly known tendency’ of students to engage in immature behavior that could be dangerous to themselves or peers); Moore by and Through Knight v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm
The judge cited Lujan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
” See also, State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm
State, 1983 OK CR 101, 668 P.2d 1126, 1130 (Okla. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:56 pm
Scully v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
(internal cites deleted) DiQuisto v. [read post]
