Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2010, 7:47 am
Coca-Cola Co. is reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶63,835 and CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,051. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:33 am
”The May 14 decision, American Dental Association v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:38 am
As the European Court of Human Rights put it in Z v Finland (1997) 25 EHRR 371, para 95: Respecting the confidentiality of health data is a vital principle in the legal system of all the contracting parties to the Convention. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am
(B.), where the court stated, 50 The law on the question is clear. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:27 am
DFO, Inc., California Court of Appeals, Third District, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,362. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
The determination of the secretary of state’s true purpose in making the deportation order was pivotal to assessing the lawfulness of the detention (R v Governor of Brixton Prison Ex p Soblen (No2) (1963) 2 QB 243 CA). [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
The CAFC standard for §112 ¶ 2 indefiniteness is lax. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:59 am
As stated by the court in Hamalainen v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:34 am
D/55; 2002 BCHRT 14, at para. 35 (summarizing the authorities). [read post]
22 May 2010, 2:44 pm
Poulton will likely seek symptomatic relief from medication for the reasons set out in paras. 50 and 51 of these reasons. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:32 am
In today’s case (Bhangal v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:00 am
The public trust doctrine has not been widely discussed in Canadian case law with the only significant mention being by the Supreme Court of Canada in British Columbia v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am
Metrobus blocking the road Standing in the way of Unite’s argument on human rights was the powerful recent judgment in Metrobus Ltd v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 829 (31 July 2009), where the Court of Appeal held that the statutory requirements relating to ballots and strike notification (Part V of the 1992 Act) do not unduly restrict the exercise of the right to strike; that the legislation has been carefully adapted over many years, in order to balance the interests of… [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:10 am
In the recent cybersquatting case of Avid Dating Life, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Neither decision refereed to the Homeless Code of Guidance para 17.40, which states that accommodation should not be considered affordable if residual income (after costs of accommodation) would be less that the level of income support (or income based jobseekers) applicable or that would be applicable if entitled to claim it. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Neither decision refereed to the Homeless Code of Guidance para 17.40, which states that accommodation should not be considered affordable if residual income (after costs of accommodation) would be less that the level of income support (or income based jobseekers) applicable or that would be applicable if entitled to claim it. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm
There was a general lack of direction and proper management of this investigation” (para 43). [read post]
15 May 2010, 8:53 pm
Dowell, 2007 BCSC 1985 at para. 36; Ostovic v. [read post]
