Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 5261 - 5280 of 13,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
United States 15-9260 Issues: (1) Whether the trial evidence was sufficient to establish that the petitioner’s robbery of a dealer of illegal drugs “in any way or degree * * * affect[ed] commerce,” in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 8:15 am by Joel R. Brandes
 The district court  concluded that E.L. became habitually resident in Guatemala prior to the time of his removal by Respondent to the United States finding Kijowska v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
  The Clyde & Co website states their Edinburgh office has over 50 lawyers and fee earners across the core sectors of insurance, professional liability, healthcare, employment and property. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Circuit rules, if a United States agency is a party in a civil case, any party has up to 45 days from the date of judgment (which was October 11 in PHH) to file a petition for rehearing by the panel or a petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm by Native American Rights Fund
  State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
As a general rule, someone who holds a patent has the exclusive right to make or sell the patented item in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
Inadmissibility Series I: INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Prostitution Inadmissibility Series INA 212– Part V 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 lists a series of classes of foreign nationals who are inadmissible to the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:29 pm by Katlin Newman, J.D.
Supreme Court recently denied the state of Colorado’s petition for review of a 2016 federal appeals court ruling regarding state campaign finance rules. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm by Nikki Siesel
In the United States trademark common law rights are significant rights that cannot be overlooked. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm by Nikki Siesel
In the United States trademark common law rights are significant rights that cannot be overlooked. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by John Elwood
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:20 am by SHG
Those who do aren’t trying to force anyone else to participate, but the plaintiffs in United Poultry Concerns v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
 This post is based on a S.34 petition in the Madras High Court, in which I represented the Petitioner challenging an arbitral award (TC Mohan v Emkay Commotrade Ltd, OP 818 of 2013). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
 This post is based on a S.34 petition in the Madras High Court, in which I represented the Petitioner challenging an arbitral award (TC Mohan v Emkay Commotrade Ltd, OP 818 of 2013). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
CBP [United States Customs and Border Protection] agents saw them, arrested them, seized their cameras, and deleted their pictures. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm by Florian Mueller
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which centers on an appeal of a restitution award. [read post]