Search for: "President v. State"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 22,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2018, 12:00 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
We don’t doubt the Obama EPA’s good faith, but like President Ronald Reagan, we say “trust but verify. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
Daphne Keller explained how the Adalah v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare In preparation for Tuesday’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:45 am
United States, in which the Court will consider two issues relating to federal computer crimes, for this blog; I did the same for Green v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
Obama: EFF joined forces with ACLU, the ACLU of Idaho, Peter Smith, and Idaho State Rep. [read post]
16 Nov 2024, 12:49 pm
Case Citation: McDermott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am
Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution says: “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
Casey, Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
It is an act for which he or she is accountable under the Constitution: As Justice Holmes stated almost a century ago in Biddle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm
Babb v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 8:57 am
V .... [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 1:44 pm
City of New York v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:26 am
” This was based on the US Supreme Court case Rooker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm
A group of legal and political experts Monday testified before the US House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol that former President Donald Trump’s allegations of voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election are unsubstantiated. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:41 pm
A recent case, Gale v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:41 pm
A recent case, Gale v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:46 am
" (It's worth noting, in passing, that it's not at all obvious that P&V's suggestion wouldn't exacerbate the "serious threat"--is it really plausible, for instance, that other nations would lend us trillions of dollars on the President's say-so that he has some unilateral authority to incur such debts even when barred by statute, and his assurances that the U.S. will repay such debts in the teeth of congressional opposition and the furor… [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:29 am
In Cummings v. [read post]
