Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The following is that part of Chapter Law 56 2009 of the State of New York which relates to Rockefeller drug reform legislation. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:37 am
” Schroer v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
T-Online.de AG & Co. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:34 am
& Annuity Co., 486 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2007); Forbes v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"the agency has issued an unambiguously final decision that puts the [individual] on notice that all administrative appeals have been exhausted" [see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
Rykoff & Co., 634 F.2d 446 (9th Cir. 1980). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
See Universal Overall Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:38 am
New York State Department of Civil Service, 872 N.Y.S.2d 578 (3rd Dept. 2009), brings the merits issue front and center, because in that case the 3rd Department followed the lead of the 4th Department in Martinez and held that the Civil Service Department had properly decided to recognize same-sex marriages lawfully contracted elsewhere in administering employee benefits programs for public employees in the state. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
This paragraph stated:"Shulman flagrantly broke the law when he awarded a lucrative food service contract to one of his business associates. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
Acknowledging that vessels may be taxed based on their market value, Polar Tankers claimed that the City's taxing authority was limited by the nondiscrimination principle developed by the Court in Transportation Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
Public Facebook Profiles A number of cases in Canada have already admitted photographs or other information posted on a public Facebook page as evidence relevant to issues raised in the litigation.24 In one case, the discovery of photographs of a party posted on a MySpace page was the basis for a request to produce more photographs that were not posted on the site.25 In Kourtesis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Lots and lots of fascinating (but rapid-fire) tables and graphs, reviewing social and demographic changes across Asian states. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
The Crown’s position, based on R. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 3:52 pm
Outside of this definition, the only reference to the term “environment” is in the purpose provision of Part V.0.1, which states that the purpose of Part V.0.1 is to provide for the protection and conservation of the “environment”. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
