Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 8,250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2012, 9:21 am
As rights-holders, Native nations and individuals have the right to cultural, religious, and spiritual practices. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:00 am
The district court, following Morrison v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:43 am
United States leaves me puzzled. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
In reporting on Omega S.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:33 am
Holder, Nos. 10-2033, 10-2280, 2012 WL 1037479 (4th Cir. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 am
In the People v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 12:18 pm
The opinion was prepared in response to a request by consumer groups concerned by court decisions, beginning with Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am
This decision, although being ‘just’ a preliminary injunction, set the stage for the term ‘active hosting’ as used by the district court of Milan in its decision RTI v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:21 pm
The case cite is Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:57 am
Macy v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
Small rights holders constantly say that federal litigation is incredibly costly, discovery is monumental, the whole process is way too expensive and unaffordable to the most vulnerable participants: small rights holders are priced out of the market. [read post]
10 May 2012, 8:57 am
Macy v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:40 am
Anderson v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:36 am
People v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Bartlett v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:54 pm
Circuit, Schroer v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Chick-fil-a’s Eat Mor Chikn v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Holder. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
