Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 5261 - 5280
of 28,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
Merced Cantu et ux., v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
This would be so even if the individual happened to die in a different location, say on vacation in another state or country. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
In Goodyear Dunlap Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act last year in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:00 am
”Since the mother was unable to show that relocating to Rhode Island was “economically necessary,” that the children’s lives would be enhanced “socially or educationally,” and that the move wouldn’t negatively impact the kids’ relationship with their dad, the AD2 thought the Family Court’s determination had a “sound and substantial basis in the record,” and left it undisturbed.No shipping these kids to The Ocean… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In Clark v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 12:00 am
Supreme Court case that prohibits it, Batson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
Since this warrant failed to satisfy that standard, the Queens County Supreme Court granted the defendants’ suppression and dismissal request.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, also had some issues with the underlying paperwork, which described the “Subject Location,” as “`a two-story, two-family home,’ with a ‘right main entrance’ and a ‘left main entrance,’ in which ‘[t]he right entrance opens up to a living… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Doe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
23 May 2023, 5:00 am
”Since the mother was unable to show that relocating to Rhode Island was “economically necessary,” that the children’s lives would be enhanced “socially or educationally,” and that the move wouldn’t negatively impact the kids’ relationship with their dad, the AD2 thought the Family Court’s determination had a “sound and substantial basis in the record,” and left it undisturbed.No shipping these kids to The Ocean… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:38 am
In the reported decision of P.H. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:03 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
Last week, in Rosario v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 9:08 pm
In Vankirk v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
